Comprehensive Examination for Spring, 2005
Master of Arts Degree in English, Austin Peay State
University
This examination is designed to test your knowledge of
literature in English and critical theory as well as
your analytical abilities. In each essay, develop a
clear thesis and support your thesis with logical
argumentation and specific evidence from relevant texts.
If other evidence would seem to call your thesis into
question, address that evidence. You must write an essay
on at least one theory-based prompt (Prompt 3 in Part A,
Prompt 3 in Part B, or Prompt 3 in Part C). This exam is
designed to be written in three hours. One additional
hour may be used for planning and revision.
Part A (40 minutes)
Respond to one of these prompts:
1. The Renaissance and Restoration literature frequently
employs idealizations of romantic love inherited from
the courtly love traditions of the Middle Ages. Equally
prominent are tragic and comic inversions of idealized
romantic love. First provide a basic outline of courtly
love with reference to medieval literature. Then analyze
two texts (Spencer, Shakespeare, Donne, Behn as
possibilities) that rely upon the idealization and two
texts (Shakespeare, Donne, Marvell, Wycherley as
possibilities) that undermine the ideal.
2. Compare Milton’s theological definition of God’s plan
in Paradise Lost to the American puritan positions of
Bradstreet, Taylor, and Edwards (use 2 of the 3). How
does Milton’s portrayal of the fall conform to the
American puritan view of the nature and potential of
humans?
3. Show how Renaissance humanism manifests itself in the
works of Spenser, Shakespeare, Milton, and Donne (at
least three of these writers); and use recent critical
theory to question the implicit evaluation of “human”
within Renaissance humanism. What new perceptions were
revealed through humanism, and what does recent critical
theory suggest concerning its limitations of perception?
Part B (40 minutes)
Respond to one of these prompts:
1. Discuss the figure of “the outside” or “the other” in
works of literature written between 1700 and 1900. Since
this figure is always culturally determined, trace
changes in the nature and role of “the outsider” or
“other” as the culture changes–that is, through
different time periods and in both English and American
literature. Discuss at least three texts from any genre.
2. Discuss variations and experiments in narrative point
of view in works of fiction written between 1700 and
1900. Consider these developments in light of changing
views about human consciousness, ways of knowing, the
nature of reality, and/or the function of art during
these periods. Choose at least three texts from various
time frames. Obvious choices would include Moll
Flanders, Gulliver’s Travels, Persuasion, Frankenstein,
The Scarlet Letter, “Bartleby the Scrivener,” Hard
Times, Huckleberry Finn, Daisy Miller, or The Awakening,
but other choices are also possible.
3. As an example of recent critical theory, Nellie McKay
in The Narrative Self: Race, Politics, and Culture in
Black American Women’s Autobiography, argues that
autobiography is a political act. She asserts, “. . .
the personal narrative became a historical site on which
aesthetics, self-confirmation of humanity, citizenship,
and the significance of racial politics shaped
African-American literary expression.” Use three texts
of the following (Franklin’s The Autobiography,
Douglass’ Narrative in the Life, Whitman’s “Song of
Myself,” or another autobiography of your choice) to
demonstrate the contours of racial and sexual politics
in the nineteenth century.
Part C (40 minutes)
Respond to one of these prompts:
1. Although we often note the prominence of decay and
death in modern and postmodern literature, resurrection
imagery may be seen as similarly prominent. Illustrate
and explain from both prose and poetry a variety of
resurrection or rebirth images whether presented in a
very political context as with Wright’s “Bright and
Morning Star” or a more personal context as with Plath’s
“Lady Lazarus.” Write about at least three texts.
2. Much debate has occurred as to whether realism (as it
was defined at the end of the nineteenth century) has
still provided the dominant mode of twentieth-century
British and American literature or whether the primary
movement is away from realism. Argue a position in
regard to the influence of or reaction against realism,
using both British and American texts.
3. In reading Modernist poets, should we focus on the
political effect that the text may have, or should we
ignore that effect? If, for instance, a particular poem
makes a destructive ideology attractive, should we
analyze the way it does so, or should we try to focus on
other aspects of the poem? Discuss poems by at least
three poets and the work of at least two theorists or
critical schools that will illustrate the most important
aspect of the question at issue.
Part D (30 minutes)
Identify or define ten of the following items.
Briefly indicate the importance of each item you
identify or define. Three sentences should suffice for
any item.
Shadrack and National Suicide Day
bildungsroman
malapropism
Chanticleer
deconstruction
Romanticism
“For he on honey-dew hath fed,/And drunk the milk of
Paradise”
trochee
formalism
Babo
naturalism
caesura
“In the swamp the banks were bare, the big cedars came
together overhead, the sun did not come through, except
in patches; in the fast deep water, in the half light,
the fishing would be tragic.”
sublime
phallocentric
Part E (30 minutes)
Explicate one of the following poems through a
careful analysis of the way its prosody and rhetoric
contribute to its theme. Discuss at least two of the
following: diction, imagery, metrics, form, figurative
language.
|
We Wear the
Mask Paul Laurence Dunbar We wear the mask that grins and lies, It hides our cheeks and shades our eyes,-- This debt we pay to human guile; With torn and bleeding hearts we smile, And mouth with myriad subtleties. Why should the world be overwise, In counting all our tears and sighs? Nay, let them only see us, while We wear the mask. We smile, but, O great Christ, our cries To thee from tortured souls arise. We sing, but oh the clay is vile Beneath our feet, and long the mile; But let the world dream otherwise, We wear the mask! |
Musée des
Beaux Arts W. H. Auden About suffering they were never wrong, The Old Masters: how well they understood Its human position; how it takes place While someone else is eating or opening a window or just walking dully along; How, when the aged are reverently, passionately waiting For the miraculous birth, there always must be Children who did not specially want it to happen, skating On a pond at the edge of the wood: They never forgot That even the dreadful martyrdom must run its course Anyhow in a corner, some untidy spot Where the dogs go on with their doggy life and the torturer’s horse Scratches its innocent behind on a tree. In Brueghel’s Icarus, for instance: how everything turns away Quite leisurely from the disaster; the plowman may Have heard the splash, the forsaken cry, But for him it was not an important failure; the sun shone As it had to on the white legs disappearing into the green Water; and the expensive delicate ship that must have seen Something amazing, a boy falling out of the sky, Had somewhere to get to and sailed calmly on. |